Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Turk J Obstet Gynecol ; 18(3): 224-235, 2021 09 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1441318

ABSTRACT

Preeclampsia and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are both life-threatening disorders when they occur during pregnancy. They are similarly characterized by systemic immune activation and have a deleterious effect on maternal endothelial cells. During the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there were reports of preeclampsia or a preeclampsia-like syndrome occurring in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the risk and prevalence of preeclampsia and SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure to identify all relevant studies published up to February 29, 2020. All studies that reported the prevalence of preeclampsia in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection were selected. A total of 10 case-control studies and 15 case series met our inclusion criteria. Pooled data revealed no significant difference between infected pregnant women and uninfected pregnant women for the risk of preeclampsia [odds ratio (OR)=1.676, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.679-4.139, p=0.236]. The stratified analysis revealed significant risk in the infected Asian pregnant women (OR=2.637, 95% CI 1.030-6.747, p=0.043), but not Caucasian. The prevalence of preeclampsia was 8.2% (95% CI 0.057-0.117) in infected pregnant women with COVID-19 in the overall population. Its prevalence was highest in North America (10.7%), followed by Asian (7.9%), Caucasian (6.7%), European (4.9%), and West Asian (2.6%) infected pregnant women. Our pooled data showed that the prevalence of preeclampsia in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection was 8.2%. However, there was no increased risk of occurrence of preeclampsia among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

2.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 52(1): 80-84, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-812513

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The presence of comorbidity poses a major clinical challenge in the care and treatment of COVID-19 patients. Moreover, having one or more comorbidities could be a life-threatening situation in COVID-19 patients. Cancer is substantially associated with significant morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. However, there is not sufficient data to conclude that cancer patients have a higher risk of COVID-19 infection. In this study, we reviewed cancer comorbidity and risk of mechanical ventilation or death in patients with confirmed COVID-19. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and CNKI, to find articles published until August 01, 2020. All relevant case series, case reports, systematic and narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and prospective and retrospective studies that reported clinical characteristics and epidemiological information of cancer patients infected with COVID-19 were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 12 cohort studies exclusively on cancer patients with confirmed COVID-19 were selected. CONCLUSIONS: According to the findings of this study, cancer was not among the most prevalent underlying diseases in patients with confirmed COVID-19. Moreover, cancer patients infected with COVID-19 had the lowest risk of mechanical ventilation or death than the non-cancer infected patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Humans , Respiration, Artificial/mortality , Risk Factors
3.
Life Sci ; 258: 118167, 2020 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-684176

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This study aimed to make a comparison between the clinical laboratory-related factors, complete blood count (CBC) indices, cytokines, and lymphocyte subsets in order to distinguish severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases from the non-severe ones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until March 31, 2020. Cochrane's Q test and the I2 statistic were used to determine heterogeneity. We used the random-effect models to pool the weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). KEY FINDINGS: Out of a total of 8557 initial records, 44 articles (50 studies) with 7865 patients (ranging from 13 to 1582), were included. Our meta-analyses with random-effect models showed a significant decrease in lymphocytes, monocyte, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD3 cells, CD19 cells, and natural killer (NK) cells and an increase in the white blood cell (WBC), neutrophils, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP)/hs-CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), ferritin, procalcitonin (PCT), and serum amyloid A (SAA), interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-2R, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferon-gamma (INF-γ) in the severe group compared to the non-severe group. However, no significant differences were found in IL-1ß, IL-17, and CD4/CD8 T cell ratio between the two groups. SIGNIFICANCE: Decrease in total lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets as well as the elevation of CRP, ESR, SAA, PCT, ferritin, and cytokines, but not IL-1ß and IL-17, were closely associated with COVID-19 severity, implying reliable indicators of severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/blood , Cytokines/blood , Lymphocytes/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , CD4-CD8 Ratio , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Cytokines/immunology , Humans , Lymphocyte Count , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL